
The Report follows Daniel J. Jones, a Senate investigator who spends years studying the CIA's post-9/11 detention and interrogation program. He reads millions of pages and builds a huge report for Senator Dianne Feinstein. The work reveals waterboarding, sleep loss, forced standing, secret prisons, and deaths in custody. Jones then fights the CIA, the White House, and other officials who want to limit or hide the findings. The movie is a tense and serious political drama that moves between quiet office work and harsh flashbacks.
The movie presents torture as cruel, unlawful, and useless for finding good information. It also shows officials defending the program, hiding mistakes, and using national security to avoid blame. Jones acts as a truth seeker who believes public records and basic law can restrain powerful agencies. The film treats public oversight, open government, and basic rights as checks on powerful agencies. Its main message is about government abuse, secrecy, and the duty to face wrongdoing.
Community feedback
Was our 10% Woke rating accurate?
Breakdown
These are the editorial factors and ratings behind our score for The Report.
Woke representation / casting
Not present. The main roles are based on real people, including Adam Driver as Daniel Jones and Annette Bening as Dianne Feinstein. The film does not present its casting as a diversity message.
0%
Woke political dialogue
Not present. The characters talk often about torture, secrecy, law, and government duty. Those subjects come from the real investigation and do not push modern identity, gender, or DEI ideas.
0%
Identity-driven story themes
Not present. The story focuses on torture, truth, secrecy, and public oversight. It does not center race, gender, sexuality, or identity politics.
0%
Western institutional / cultural critique
Not present. The movie criticizes CIA secrecy and government abuse in a real investigation. Its criticism does not attack Christianity, family life, traditional gender roles, capitalism, or Western culture.
0%
Woke character or canon changes
Not relevant. The film dramatizes a real Senate investigation rather than changing a fictional character or historical identity to make a diversity point. Some events and people are compressed for the movie, but the changes are not identity-driven.
0%
Anti-woke backlash and complaints
A small number of online users called the film liberal and rejected its claim that torture failed. The reported comments came from low-rated user reviews and did not form a large campaign. The X research pass found no anti-woke complaints.
8%
Creator track record context
Scott Z. Burns has a record of supporting progressive social issues and environmental activism. Steven Soderbergh and Nancy Dubuc add progressive and workplace diversity signals. The wider producer group includes many people with little or no public activism record, so the background is moderate rather than dominant.
43%
Production