
Augustine is a sick scientist left alone at an Arctic base after a deadly event ruins most of Earth. He tries to warn a spaceship crew not to come home. The crew is flying back from a moon near Jupiter and does not know Earth is dying. The film feels cold, sad, and quiet, with big space and ice scenes and a soft hope at the end.
The story is mainly about regret, loneliness, and a father who wants to help the people he failed. A normal viewer mostly sees a sad sci-fi drama, not a loud identity lecture. The spaceship crew is mixed by race, with a black captain and a black woman engineer in key jobs. The global disaster is never fully explained on screen, but the film and its director treat it as something humans caused, which some people read as a climate warning. There is almost no anti-woke fight over this title.
Community feedback
Was our 32% Woke rating accurate?
Breakdown
These are the editorial factors and ratings behind our score for The Midnight Sky.
Woke representation / casting
The Aether crew is clearly mixed: black commander Adewole, black engineer Maya, Latino Sanchez, plus white leads. That fits modern “diverse space team” casting and is easy to notice. Roles are competent but not sold as a girl-power or race-quota lecture. Near-future NASA-style setting keeps it from feeling like pure forced rewrite.
30%
Woke political dialogue
Characters talk about survival, home, family, and the ruined Earth more than slogans. The disaster is never spelled out as a party speech. Any “humans did this” message is soft and mostly in mood and interviews, not long activist monologues.
18%
Identity-driven story themes
Core story is regret, fatherhood, isolation, and hope for a new world. The man-made global disaster can read as a mild climate warning. Race, gender, and sexuality are not the engine of the plot. An interracial couple and a baby stand for hope, not a lesson on identity.
22%
Western institutional / cultural critique
The film suggests people wrecked their own planet and society, which is a soft “we are the problem” idea. It does not push hard modern attacks on whiteness, patriarchy, Christianity, or classic Western family as the main point. Absent-father regret even fits older moral storytelling.
15%
Woke character or canon changes
Not relevant. Changes from the book are mostly pregnancy for a real-life cast reason, new action beats, and renamed crew. No clear race or gender swap of a famous real person or legacy hero for DEI goals.
0%
Anti-woke backlash and complaints
Almost no organized right-leaning “this is woke propaganda” wave. A few thin user comments mix climate politics and “woke” gripes. Main public fight was quality and pacing, not identity agenda.
5%
Creator track record context
Clooney’s liberal politics and climate framing, plus Brooks-Dalton’s climate-fiction background, give mild progressive context. Screenwriter and most producers are low on identity activism. Overall signal is moderate liberal prestige, not hard DEI doctrine.
28%
Production